"There is this new attitude that 'if my pleasure is something I deem good, then you should pay into it and enable me as well,'" commented one of my friends on Facebook. With utterly inescapable logic, she concluded that, based on this reasoning, the government should subsidize her daily ration of dark chocolate as well. The argument is as follows:
The social, medical, and economic benefits of such a scheme are clear. Politicians would be wise to start a political party based on these principles, or at least incorporate these ideas into the plank of an already-existing party platform. Not only would chocolate-for-free garner even more popular support than contraception-for-free, it would also encounter less opposition. Consider this:
- Many people want dark chocolate.
- Eating dark chocolate every day has proven health benefits, such as decreasing the risk of high blood pressure and heart disease.
- Decreased risk of high blood pressure and heart disease leads to lower medical costs to be borne by individuals and the healthcare system.
- The government should therefore provide dark chocolate for free.
So I say, forget free sex. We want free chocolate. Are you with me?
- Chocolate appeals to men, women, and children of all ages, whereas contraception would only arguably be beneficial for men and women of child-bearing age.
- Chocolate does not contain synthetic hormones that may raise the risk of cancer and harm the environment by polluting our streams.
- Chocolate does not cause a small but real risk of increased blood pressure, blood clots, heart attack, and stroke.
- No one (as far as I know) has a religious objection to eating chocolate or providing free chocolate to others.
Sign me up! (Mmmmmmm)
ReplyDeleteBy my count, you're the sixth founding member, David. Congrats!
DeleteOh,yeah!
DeleteLove chocolate. ♥ Love this article. ♥
Our numbers are growing ever greater. Power to the palate!
DeleteI want some! (This is Andy, Hi Karee)
ReplyDeleteHey, Andy, great to see you on the blog. Welcome!
Delete